Master plan as a legal instrument for organization of urban space
Keywords:
urban planning, master plan, town planning instrument, principle of plan competenceAbstract
The Federal Constitution has raised the master plan to the status of being a fundamental legal resource for organization of urban space (article 182). However, doubts on the application of the law that laid down the plan are not uncommon. The relationship of the master plan with other laws dealing with urban matters still raises important doctrinal and jurisprudential controversies. This is mainly due to traditional ways of resolving conflicts between legal norms - which do not apply to the antinomies existing between the law establishing the master plan - and other local urban laws. There are some concerns as to how far the autonomy of the municipal / district legislation goes in so far as handling urban land occupation, in view of the so-called principle of plan competence; it is questioned, for example, if local laws can regulate urban planning instruments not contemplated in the master plan, such as residential lands, for one. In fact, the topic was subject to appraisal by the Federal Supreme Court, in the judgment of Extraordinary Appeal No. 607.940-DF, which will be object of analysis in a specific chapter. The present study intends to address these and other issues, such as the specific legislative procedure for editing the master plan, the scope of the plan, its change, its minimum content and its periodic review process.
References
ALFONSO, Luciano Parejo. Derecho urbanístico: instituciones básicas. Mendoza: Ciudad Argentina, 1986.
ANTUNES, Paulo de Bessa. Direito ambiental. 17. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2015.
BERCOVICI, Gilberto. Desigualdades regionais, Estado e Constituição. São Paulo: Max Limonad, 2003.
BOBBIO, Norberto. Teoria do ordenamento jurídico. 5. ed. Brasília: Universidade de Brasília, 1994.
CÂMARA, Jacintho Arruda. Plano diretor. In: DALLARI, Adilson Abreu; FERRAZ, Sérgio (Coord.). Estatuto da Cidade: comentários à Lei Federal 10.257/2001. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2003.
CARVALHO, Paulo de Barros. Direito tributário: linguagem e método. 6. ed. São Paulo: Noeses, 2015.
CHARLES, Hubert. Les principes de l’urbanisme. Paris: Dalloz, 1993.
CHOAY, Françoise. O urbanismo: utopias e realidades – uma antologia. 5. ed. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 1998.
CORREIA, Fernando Alves. Manual de direito do urbanismo. 3. ed. v. I. Coimbra: Almedina, 2006.
FERRAZ JUNIOR, Tercio Sampaio. Introdução ao estudo do Direito. 3. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2001.
GARCIA DE ENTERRÍA, Eduardo; PAREJO ALFONSO, Luciano. Lecciones de derecho urbanístico I. Madrid: Civitas, 1979.
JACOBS, Jane. Morte e vida de grandes cidades. Trad. Carlos S. Mendes Rosa. 3. ed. São Paulo: WMF Martins Fontes, 2011.
KALFLÈCHE, Grégory. Droit de l´urbanisme. Paris: Universitaires de France, 2012.
LE CORBUSIER. La Charte d’Athènes (suivi de entretien avec les étudiants des écoles d’architecture). Paris: Minuit, 1957.
LE CORBUSIER. Urbanismo. Fundação Le Corbusier. Trad. Maria Ermantina Galvão Gomes Pereira. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1992.
LEVIN, Alexandre. Operação urbana consorciada: concertação público-privada para a justa distribuição dos benefícios decorrentes da atividade urbanística. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris, 2015.
LEVIN, Alexandre. Parcelamento, edificação e utilização compulsórios de imóveis públicos urbanos. Belo Horizonte: Fórum, 2010.
MENCIO, Mariana. Regime jurídico da audiência pública na gestão democrática das cidades. Belo Horizonte: Fórum, 2007.
MORAND-DEVILLER, Jacqueline. Droit de l’urbanisme. 3. ed. Paris: Dalloz, 1996.
OLIVEIRA, Regis Fernandes de; HORVATH, Estevão. Manual de direito financeiro. 6. ed. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2003.
PARADA, Ramón. Derecho administrativo III – Bienes públicos e Derecho urbanístico. 10. ed. Madrid: Marcial Pons, 2004.
PINTO, Victor Carvalho. Direito urbanístico: plano diretor e direito de propriedade. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2005.
SILVA, José Afonso da. Direito urbanístico brasileiro. 4. ed. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2006.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By submitting the academic text to the Journal of the Federal Regional Court of the 3rd Region (Revista do Tribunal Regional Federal da 3ª Região), the authors declare to be the holders of the copyright, responding exclusively for any claims related to such rights; as well as guaranteeing the non-existence of any breach of academic ethics.
The authors retain the copyright and grant the Journal of the Federal Regional Court of the 3rd Region the right of publication, without encumbrance and without limitations as to term, territory, or any other.
The concepts and opinions expressed in the signed works are the sole responsibility of their authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of this Journal, nor of the Federal Regional Court of the 3rd Region.
