Do the laws that “prevent” injunctions really prevent them?
Keywords:
Law 12.016/2019, preliminaries, preventive laws, typological dynamics, normative controlAbstract
Of the most recent crop of new legislation, perhaps the vegetable most damaged by these jumpers is Law No. 12.016, of August 7, 2009, which regulates the individual and collective writ of mandamus and makes other provisions. Not content with ignoring the historical roots of the writ of mandamus, these jumpers have approached the institute without the indispensable knowledge of experience and under the auspices of a rather clumsy dogma. Of all the improprieties, my attention is drawn to the hermeneutic that has been built around §§ 2 and 5 of Article 7 of the law. The “prohibition” contained in these texts can be sustained on an abstract-textual level, but it doesn't stand up to a more accurate analysis when looking at the phenomenon from an empirical-normative level. Practice has revealed a real chasm between the general, abstract text and the norm that lives from it. If the legislative text seems to prohibit, in day-to-day legal practice the legal norm that is extracted from it is not so prohibitive. In other words, within the overall normative communication, the laws “preventing” injunctions constitute a weak code.
References
ALVIM, Eduardo Arruda. Mandado de segurança no direito tributário. São Paulo: RT, 1998, pp. 208-214.
AGUSTÍN GORDILLO. Tratado de derecho administrativo. t. 2. 5. ed. Belo Horizonte: Del Rey e Fundación de Derecho Administrativo, 2003, p. XIII-32.
BUENO, Cássio Scarpinella. A nova lei do mandado de segurança: comentários sistemáticos à Lei nº 12.016, de 7-8-2009. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2009, p. 45.
COSTA, Eduardo José da Fonseca. O “direito vivo” das liminares: um estudo pragmático sobre os pressupostos para sua concessão. São Paulo: PUC - SP [dissertação de mestrado], 2009, pp. 54 e ss.DERZI, Misabel de Abreu Machado. Direito tributário, direito penal e tipo. São Paulo: RT, 1988, pp. 37 e ss.
FERRAZ, Sérgio. Mandado de segurança. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2006, pp. 245-262.
FIGUEIREDO, Lúcia Valle. Mandado de segurança. 4. ed. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2002, pp. 119-124
KAUFMANN, Arthur. Filosofia do direito. Lisboa: Calouste Gulbekian, 2004, pp. 188 e ss.
LARENZ, Karl. Metodologia da ciência do direito. 3. ed. Lisboa: Calouste Gulbekian, 1997, pp. 621 e ss.
MARINS, James. Direito processual tributário brasileiro (administrativo e judicial). São Paulo: Dialética, 2001, pp. 415-417
YARSHELL, Flávio Luiz. Tutela jurisdicional. 2. ed. São Paulo: DPJ, 2006, pp. 42 e ss.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By submitting the academic text to the Journal of the Federal Regional Court of the 3rd Region (Revista do Tribunal Regional Federal da 3ª Região), the authors declare to be the holders of the copyright, responding exclusively for any claims related to such rights; as well as guaranteeing the non-existence of any breach of academic ethics.
The authors retain the copyright and grant the Journal of the Federal Regional Court of the 3rd Region the right of publication, without encumbrance and without limitations as to term, territory, or any other.
The concepts and opinions expressed in the signed works are the sole responsibility of their authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of this Journal, nor of the Federal Regional Court of the 3rd Region.
